<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User configuration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.incase.de/index.php/2008/01/04/user-configuration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.incase.de/index.php/2008/01/04/user-configuration/</link>
	<description>Sven's occasional log</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:58:31 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sven</title>
		<link>http://blog.incase.de/index.php/2008/01/04/user-configuration/comment-page-1/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.incase.de/index.php/2008/01/04/user-configuration/#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>Well, as long as the same application on all architectures supports the XDG spec, this works fine with network mounts.
And using different versions of the same program on different architectures is always asking for trouble. Apart from the fact that the same application on different Unix types (even if the same version) isn&#039;t necessarily expecting all its files in the same location or is even capable of reading the same files due to their binary encoding which might differ between architectures and/or host OSes.

So this really doesn&#039;t make matters all that much worse or more complex for Multi-OS/Multi-Arch networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as long as the same application on all architectures supports the XDG spec, this works fine with network mounts.<br />
And using different versions of the same program on different architectures is always asking for trouble. Apart from the fact that the same application on different Unix types (even if the same version) isn&#8217;t necessarily expecting all its files in the same location or is even capable of reading the same files due to their binary encoding which might differ between architectures and/or host OSes.</p>
<p>So this really doesn&#8217;t make matters all that much worse or more complex for Multi-OS/Multi-Arch networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.incase.de/index.php/2008/01/04/user-configuration/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.incase.de/index.php/2008/01/04/user-configuration/#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>And all this gleefully ignores network-mounted home directories shared across multiple architectures.  Whee!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And all this gleefully ignores network-mounted home directories shared across multiple architectures.  Whee!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
